The addressability dividend

When an advertising channel becomes addressable, does advertisers investment grow — and how long does that advantage last? We put LiveRamp's addressability data next to MediaRadar's ad spend measurement across eight quarters of connected TV. The results uncovered a pattern that applies to CTV and emerging channels alike.

A hand holding a television remote control
A couple on a sofa watching a streaming service
A woman holding a remote control beside a dog on a sofa
The Finding

Turning addressability on is a critical step in platform emergence and maturity.

Streaming platforms that newly enabled addressability saw the biggest jump in advertising revenue growth. Once addressability is established, though, it stops being a differentiator — it becomes table stakes.

That makes connected TV a case study in how an advertising channel matures — and a reasonable guide to what happens next in the channels now taking shape around AI.

1.9x the growth rate

Ad spend growth for a streaming platform in the six quarters after it switched on identity-based addressability, relative to platforms that were already addressable throughout the same period.

+25.9%
Newly addressable platform
Average quarterly ad spend, after vs. before integration
+13.3%
Already-addressable platforms
Six premium streaming services, same two periods
+7.4%
No identity integration
Comparable streaming inventory, same two periods
The Natural Experiment

One platform gave us a clean before and after

Midway through 2024, one major streaming platform turned on addressability for the first time, and its activation footprint climbed from nothing to a substantial and growing base over the following six quarters. That gives us something rare in media research: a real before-and-after, inside a single dataset, with comparable platforms available as a reference group.

We split the eight quarters at the integration date and compared how average quarterly ad spend changed across that boundary — for the newly addressable platform, for the platforms that were already addressable, and for a premium streaming property that had no identity integration at all and therefore acted as a control.

Figure 1

Ad spend growth across the integration boundary

Change in average quarterly ad spend, the six quarters after the integration went live versus the two quarters before it.

Pre-period: the two quarters to mid-2024. Post-period: the following six quarters to Q4 2025. Peer set: six premium ad-supported streaming services. Sources: LiveRamp audience distribution data; MediaRadar advertising spend measurement.

The platform that turned addressability on grew fastest. Platforms that already had it grew at about half that rate. Inventory with no addressability grew the slowest, at roughly a quarter of the newly addressable platform's pace. One caveat belongs alongside that finding: that platform was scaling its ad-supported subscriber base rapidly over the same period, so we can show that addressability and investment moved together but cannot isolate one as the cause of the other.

Because the activation ramp was gradual rather than instant, we tested whether the answer depends on exactly where we draw the line between "before" and "after." It doesn't — the gap holds within half a percentage point across three different cut-points.

Sensitivity to the pre/post cut-point
Pre-period definitionNewly addressableAlready addressableNo integrationGap vs. peers
Two quarters to integration+25.9%+13.3%+7.4%12.6 pts
Three quarters to integration+25.5%+13.1%+7.3%12.4 pts
Full year before+25.0%+12.9%+6.4%12.2 pts
The Market-Level Picture

Across premium streaming, activation and investment rose in step

Looking at the whole addressable set, both measures climbed steadily across the eight quarters, and stayed within a few index points of each other for most of the window. Ad spend finished the period growing somewhat faster than activation.

Figure 2

Audience activation and ad spend, indexed

Seven premium streaming platforms with continuous coverage. Both series indexed to Q1 2024 = 100, on a single shared scale.

Over the full window, activation grew 20.4% and ad spend grew 28.7%. The two series share a trend; this is co-movement, not a causal estimate. Platforms that share a single identity destination are counted once.

Comparing full years rather than quarters, the addressable set grew ad spend 13.9% from 2024 to 2025. The non-addressable control grew 6.4% over the same two years — less than half the rate.

Addressable premium streaming grew its advertising revenue more than twice as fast as comparable inventory that advertisers could not target by identity.

What This Means
A woman working at a laptop
  1. 01

    For media owners: the commercial return on addressability is concentrated in the period right after you enable it. Being early wins a premium, and the platform in our natural experiment captured roughly double the market growth rate in the six quarters following its integration.

  2. 02

    For media owners without an identity integration: Over two years, the control group grew at less than half the rate of its addressable peers, a gap too large to be ignored.

  3. 03

    For advertisers and agencies: a platform's activation volume is not a proxy for how well it will perform for you. Once a platform is addressable, every advertiser should take advantage of the enriched targeting and measurement available.

  4. 04

    For everyone: addressability is table stakes in connected TV. The window in which it functions as a competitive advantage rather than a baseline requirement is closing — and the next channel to open that window has already started to form.

What Comes Next
Outlook

The Next Channel is Forming, With The Identity Layer To Come

Connected TV did not invent this pattern. Social media ran the same course a decade earlier: addressability arrived, conferred an advantage on the platforms that moved first, and then became something advertisers simply assumed. What this report adds is a measurement of how quickly that transition happens, and how much it is worth while it lasts.

The channels now forming around AI are at the stage connected TV occupied before 2024. Conversational assistants, AI-native search and agentic interfaces are beginning to carry commercial messages. Formats are experimental, inventory is not standardized, measurement barely exists — and identity, in the sense this report uses the word, is just beginning.

If the pattern documented here holds, the implication is an uncomfortable one for anyone planning to wait. The return on connectivity was largest at the moment a channel became addressable and decayed as addressability became universal. For the channels being built around AI, that moment has not happened yet.

The window in which addressability is an advantage rather than an expectation opens once per channel. In connected TV it is proven. In AI it is just beginning.

Methodology
Window. Eight quarters, Q1 2024 through Q4 2025. Data was available into 2026 but is excluded — see below.
Measures. The activation measure is the number of distinct LiveRamp audiences with at least one distribution job to a platform in a calendar quarter, from LiveRamp production distribution logs. The investment measure is MediaRadar's independent quarterly advertising spend estimate for the same platform. All figures in this report are expressed as index values or rates of change; neither party's underlying values are published.
Scope. Connected TV, ad-supported streaming inventory only. Live streaming sports inventory is excluded throughout, because coverage of it begins partway through the window and would create artificial growth.
Why 2026 is excluded. Connected TV measurement changed materially in the first half of 2026: an additional spend data source was integrated, substantially expanding measured advertiser and impression coverage; spend for several months was recalibrated upward; CTV was separated from linear television as its own media category; and several streaming properties entered coverage with no back-history. Measured CTV spend rises roughly 30% across the Q4 2025 to Q1 2026 boundary as a result. Year-over-year CTV comparisons on this basis are not expected to be like-for-like until 2027.
Level of aggregation. Identity activation is recorded at the level of a parent destination, which in several cases spans more than one consumer-facing service. Where a single destination covers multiple platforms, those platforms are counted once, not summed. Where the spend measure is finer-grained than the activation measure, we aggregate up rather than split down. Platforms whose coverage begins or ends partway through the window are excluded from the aggregate rather than shown with gaps.
The control group. The non-addressable comparison is a premium ad-supported streaming property with meaningful measured ad spend and no direct identity integration during the window. It is not a randomised control and its inventory is sold through a parent whose other properties are addressable, so the comparison is directional rather than absolute.
On correlation. The two aggregate series correlate strongly in levels, but quarter-over-quarter changes in the two series are uncorrelated, and rank correlation across mature platforms is close to none.
What we cannot claim. This study establishes that newly addressable inventory grew faster than already-addressable inventory, which grew faster than non-addressable inventory, consistently across multiple specifications. It does not establish causation for any individual platform, and it does not support a dose-response relationship between activation volume and spend.

A joint research collaboration between LiveRamp and MediaRadar. Activation data: LiveRamp production audience distribution logs. Advertising spend: MediaRadar advertising measurement. Analysis window Q1 2024 – Q4 2025.

All figures in this report are index values or rates of change. No underlying activation counts or spend values are disclosed.

LiveRamp + MediaRadar The Addressability Dividend Connected TV · Q1 2024 – Q4 2025