In a K-shaped economy, Super Bowl LX reveals a divided market—where growth sectors accelerate and legacy brands recalibrate.
For decades, the Super Bowl functioned as advertising’s clearest display of brand dominance—a linear TV spectacle owned by CPG heavyweights, automakers and beer brands with the budgets to match. But this year’s game reflected something broader: a reshaped competitive field defined by economic divergence, platform fragmentation and a new class of growth-fueled advertisers.
The K-shaped economy didn’t just show up in the commercials. It showed up in who bought them—and where.
MediaRadar’s comprehensive Super Bowl LX data drop examines the full advertising landscape across broadcast and streaming, highlighting which categories expanded, which pulled back and how participation evolved in 2026.
The Super Bowl is no longer synonymous with linear TV. While broadcast remains the cultural centerpiece, streaming has transformed the game into a multi-platform event. Audiences aren’t just watching; they’re logging in. The ad buy isn’t singular; it’s layered.
That evolution matters.
Streaming has introduced new degrees of flexibility, data precision and incremental reach. It has also lowered structural barriers to participation. The Super Bowl is still expensive—but it is no longer exclusively a one-shot, broadcast-only bet.
For emerging brands, that distinction is critical. Streaming makes participation more modular and strategically targeted. For incumbents, it extends scale while adding accountability.
The event hasn’t fragmented. The strategy around it has.
This shift toward a cross-platform Super Bowl moment underscores a broader industry challenge: managing the Video Everywhere landscape. As audiences move fluidly between linear and streaming, advertisers need unified visibility into how and where video investments are deployed. Solving that fragmentation requires more than isolated channel reporting—it demands a consolidated view of the full video ecosystem.
Super Bowl as a Signal of Trajectory
Historically, buying a Super Bowl ad signaled scale. In 2026, the K-shaped economy reveals a divided market for Super Bowl LX—where growth sectors accelerate and legacy brands recalibrate.
The brands leaning aggressively into Super Bowl LX increasingly came from high-growth sectors—most notably software and AI. These companies are operating in expansion mode, fueled by capital investment and enterprise demand. For them, mass visibility accelerates category authority.
In a competitive technology landscape, cultural ubiquity builds trust faster than product messaging alone. The Super Bowl compresses awareness cycles into a single moment and broadcasts permanence. It’s less about short-term lift and more about staking long-term position.
At the same time, some traditional Super Bowl mainstays appeared more selective. Categories that historically dominated the game approached this year with sharper allocation discipline.
This isn’t retrenchment. It’s recalibration.
Mature brands are navigating margin pressure, diversified channel ecosystems and heightened performance expectations. Retail media networks, shoppable video and precision digital buys offer measurable return in ways that even the Super Bowl’s cultural impact can’t always quantify.
In a K-shaped economy, capital doesn’t disappear—it redistributes.
Some brands are widening the gap through bold brand-building plays. Others are optimizing for efficiency across a broader portfolio.
The K-shaped economy describes divergence—one segment accelerating upward while another stabilizes or pulls back. Super Bowl LX reflected that divergence across both advertiser mix and media environment.
Growth-stage innovators used both linear and streaming to amplify momentum and define category narratives. Legacy brands deployed more surgical strategies, often blending traditional presence with diversified channel investment beyond the game itself.
And because streaming now sits alongside broadcast, the competitive field has subtly widened. Participation isn’t binary anymore. It’s tiered.
That structural shift benefits challengers. It allows them to stand shoulder to shoulder with historic big spenders—sometimes on the same screen.
The biggest takeaway from Super Bowl LX isn’t creative tone or celebrity cameos. It’s structural change.
The mythology of the game remains intact. But the composition of power is evolving. Super Bowl LX didn’t mark the end of historic big spenders. It marked the arrival of new ones—armed with capital, ambition and multi-platform strategy. And in a K-shaped economy, that’s exactly what you’d expect.
See MediaRadar’s complete Super Bowl LX advertising analysis for a deeper look at these trends.
Want to Know More?
ABOUT THE AUTHOR | Gray Wheatley
Gray Wheatley is the Product Manager for Sports at MediaRadar, where he focuses on building products that connect and contextualize sports-related marketing intelligence. With over 15 years of experience across the sports industry, he helps rights holders, brands, and agencies use data to optimize performance and maximize asset value.